jcd writes:
"I'm rather excited to get going with Soylent and to watch it grow. Nay, help it grow. I have lurked in /. for more than a decade (note: I'm not the same username over there, I know, how sneaky), and always wished I could have been involved with the beginning. So this is a great opportunity, and I joined as soon as I saw what Soylent was doing. Not to mention the fact that I felt right at home with the old style. It's very comfortable.
So here's a question for everyone. Are we going to be the same as slashdot? A clone that focuses as entirely as possible on tech related news? Or will we branch out to other topics? I'm interested to see either way. I posted a comment to this effect in one of our two existing polls, and it may be a community-wide assumption, but I do think it merits a discussion."
(Score: 1) by shadov on Thursday February 20 2014, @05:44PM
Climate change is both science and stuff that matters, so I'd say it fits in here just fine.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 20 2014, @06:01PM
> Climate change is both science and stuff that matters, so I'd say it fits in here just fine.
I would technically agree, but it has become SO politicized in the USA, almost any discussion on it is nothing but noise. You can get that anywhere.
(Score: 1) by shadov on Thursday February 20 2014, @07:13PM
> I would technically agree, but it has become SO politicized in the USA, almost any discussion on it is nothing but noise. You can get that anywhere.
The signal-to-noise ratio certainly tends to be bad, but I don't think it has fallen to zero. The discussions with slashdot/soylent type audience and moderation system are at least less horrible than in most other places.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 21 2014, @07:21AM
It's politics, and it is covered quite well in other venues.
I think a lot of people like to see the stories not because they're on topic, but because they agree. It's always a wonderful opportunity to bash people who don't think the same as us.