jcd writes:
"I'm rather excited to get going with Soylent and to watch it grow. Nay, help it grow. I have lurked in /. for more than a decade (note: I'm not the same username over there, I know, how sneaky), and always wished I could have been involved with the beginning. So this is a great opportunity, and I joined as soon as I saw what Soylent was doing. Not to mention the fact that I felt right at home with the old style. It's very comfortable.
So here's a question for everyone. Are we going to be the same as slashdot? A clone that focuses as entirely as possible on tech related news? Or will we branch out to other topics? I'm interested to see either way. I posted a comment to this effect in one of our two existing polls, and it may be a community-wide assumption, but I do think it merits a discussion."
(Score: 1) by Thexalon on Friday February 21 2014, @09:35AM
I disagree with that idea:
- There's already an understanding in most political or social discussions that you're never really going to convince the "other" side to agree with you.
- If you're making arguments and not hurling insults, then the discussions clarify different worldviews, their strengths and weaknesses.
- As long as everyone is coming back to the table, there's a tacit agreement to disagree.
- On rare occasions, you find agreement where you didn't expect it. For example, a group of Occupy Wall Street folks met up with a group of Tea Party members, and promptly agreed on a number of points, mostly campaign finance and criminal penalties for bank executives.
Every task is easy if somebody else is doing it.