Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by mattie_p on Sunday February 16 2014, @02:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the conspiracy-or-consensus dept.

AudioGuy writes:

"You heard it here first. According to Natural News, a NASA report has verified that carbon dioxide actually cools the atmosphere.

Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence."

[Ed. note] I'm going to post this, because why not argue science that has been settled? Also, we needed to test the algorithm that generated mod points by sparking conversation. This was as good a way as any to get posts quickly. Sorry if you thought SoylentNews really endorsed this. ~Mattie_p

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by mrbluze on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:03AM

    by mrbluze (49) on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:03AM (#226)
    That's true, but science in general is in trouble on that front. The number of retracted scientific papers is skyrocketing, and a large proportion of these are due to fraud.
    --
    Do it yourself, 'cause no one else will do it yourself.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by AudioGuy on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:11AM

    by AudioGuy (24) on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:11AM (#227) Journal

    And notice the bias of the editor here, just HAD to put a counter link at the end of me most excellent submission.

    • (Score: 1) by mattie_p on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:16AM

      by mattie_p (13) on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:16AM (#229) Journal
      All editors are biased. I just happen to be biased towards SCIENCE!
      • (Score: 2, Funny) by AudioGuy on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:19AM

        by AudioGuy (24) on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:19AM (#230) Journal

        Admit it, you are just another member of THE AGW CABAL!

        Ruining perfectly good stories.

        • (Score: 1) by janrinok on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:37AM

          by janrinok (52) on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:37AM (#233) Journal

          'Ruining perfectly good stories'

          Hardly, in this instance!

          --
          It's always my fault...
          • (Score: 1) by mattie_p on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:38AM

            by mattie_p (13) on Sunday February 16 2014, @03:38AM (#234) Journal

            It was a perfectly ruined story before I ruined it.

            Wait, what?