Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by janrinok on Monday March 17 2014, @08:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the borg-revisited dept.

sl4shd0rk writes:

"Bill Gates says everyone needs to prepare to be out of work in 20 years due to Robots/software taking over most jobs. In preparation for this, Gates recommends people 'should basically get on their knees and beg businesses to keep employing humans' and reduce operating overhead for businesses by 'eliminating payroll and corporate income taxes while also not raising the minimum wage'. Bill Gates, you may recall, is the former CEO of Microsoft whose business acumen has brought the technology sector such things as Metro, Windows Phone and Xbox One.

BusinessInsider took a similar theme earlier this year."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Appalbarry on Monday March 17 2014, @10:57PM

    by Appalbarry (66) on Monday March 17 2014, @10:57PM (#17913) Homepage Journal

    Admittedly a few years since I studying any accounting. but I'm pretty sure that employee wages are what you call an EXPENSE which reduces your INCOME, and in consequence the taxes paid by your corporation.

    Off the top of my head I can't think of any EXPENSE item that can be applied directly to reduce tax liability.

    Because that would be, well, stupid.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Daniel Dvorkin on Tuesday March 18 2014, @12:56AM

    by Daniel Dvorkin (1099) on Tuesday March 18 2014, @12:56AM (#17932)

    I'm pretty sure that employee wages are what you call an EXPENSE which reduces your INCOME, and in consequence the taxes paid by your corporation.

    Sure, because corporate accounting gets to use a different definition of "income" from the one applied to human beings. That's a legal fiction, and one we the people can rewrite if we choose.

    --
    Pipedot [pipedot.org]:Soylent [dev.soylentnews.org]::BSD:Linux
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 18 2014, @07:47PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 18 2014, @07:47PM (#18299)

      Sure, because corporate accounting gets to use a different definition of "income" from the one applied to human beings.

      But...but...but... I thought corporations WERE human beings!