An anonymous coward writes:
"An interesting article about the shift in open source from idealistic to pragmatic. The author compares the relative obscurity of FOSS software such as MediaGoblin and KDE's MakePlayLive co-op to commercial software. The article then goes on to discuss the split between FOSS's goal to provide freedom to users and to provide high-quality software. Also mentioned is the split between commercial and non-commercial FOSS."
(Score: 2) by marcello_dl on Sunday March 23 2014, @09:18PM
Make it "They had to keep copying to keep up, but commercial browsers copy to keep up themselves" so we have an instance of innovative FOSS that succeeds so that others need to copy its features.
(Score: 1) by Tork on Sunday March 23 2014, @09:45PM
Slashdolt logic: 1600 x 1200 > 1920 x 1200
(Score: 2) by marcello_dl on Monday March 24 2014, @07:41AM
You tell me. Go ahead and explain why commercial software is innovative, apart the need to do things differently for the sake of differentiating from the competition, whether the user likes it or not.
(Score: 1) by Tork on Monday March 24 2014, @12:03PM
Slashdolt logic: 1600 x 1200 > 1920 x 1200
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 24 2014, @12:33PM
The answer was, FF is a web browser, browsing protocols are added/tweaked all the time. Let's see slackware and systemd, for a fitting example.
(Score: 1) by Tork on Monday March 24 2014, @01:09PM
Slashdolt logic: 1600 x 1200 > 1920 x 1200