Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by LaminatorX on Sunday March 23 2014, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the Bizarre-Cathedrals dept.

An anonymous coward writes:

"An interesting article about the shift in open source from idealistic to pragmatic. The author compares the relative obscurity of FOSS software such as MediaGoblin and KDE's MakePlayLive co-op to commercial software. The article then goes on to discuss the split between FOSS's goal to provide freedom to users and to provide high-quality software. Also mentioned is the split between commercial and non-commercial FOSS."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by cubancigar11 on Monday March 24 2014, @02:35AM

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Monday March 24 2014, @02:35AM (#20115) Homepage

    If you want to claim a copyright you should start being non-anonymous and engage on the same talk page.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 24 2014, @03:39AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 24 2014, @03:39AM (#20126)

    It's not my copyright, it's Wikipedias. and it was stolen by my book. and I don't have to be non-anonymous to call the textbook companies out on it. They stole it, IP extremist hypocrite thieves.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 24 2014, @03:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 24 2014, @03:42AM (#20127)

    Not everyone has the resources of a big corporation to enforce IP. It's mostly the big corporations that have these sorts of resources to go after the little guy but whoever put that image up on Wikipedia is far less likely to have the resources to go after the IP extremist thieves that steal their work without attribution. Yet the big corporations wrongfully accuse everyone else of 'stealing'. Only when others do it I suppose. The hypocrites.