Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by LaminatorX on Sunday March 23 2014, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the Bizarre-Cathedrals dept.

An anonymous coward writes:

"An interesting article about the shift in open source from idealistic to pragmatic. The author compares the relative obscurity of FOSS software such as MediaGoblin and KDE's MakePlayLive co-op to commercial software. The article then goes on to discuss the split between FOSS's goal to provide freedom to users and to provide high-quality software. Also mentioned is the split between commercial and non-commercial FOSS."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 24 2014, @04:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 24 2014, @04:28AM (#20135)

    The FSF uses the term "Freedom" in the same way as it's used in the real world.

    Think about it: What part of the planet does "The free world" refer to? The part of the world with constitutions and human rights that restricts removing the freedom of others, or the parts that put no restrictions on e.g. owning slaves?

  • (Score: 2) by TheloniousToady on Monday March 24 2014, @08:18AM

    by TheloniousToady (820) on Monday March 24 2014, @08:18AM (#20170)

    That's an interesting point, but note that freedom-loving constitutions restrict the rights (powers) of governments relative to individuals. In contrast, the FSF's approach to "freedom" is to restrict the powers of all parties - including governments, corporations, and individuals - in a certain way via "copyleft".