Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

Linux Mint as Mainstream Replacement for XP

posted by mrbluze on Monday March 31 2014, @08:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the can't-resist-that-minty-freshness dept.

prospectacle writes:

How to best replace Windows XP has become interesting to a much wider group of people, due to the end of official support for the product. (a previous story mentioned an Indian state government that urged its departments to use India's home-grown linux distro "BOSS Linux").

Some people may be using XP because it came with their computer and they never gave it a second thought, but there are probably plenty of others who don't want to spend the money, don't like the look of Windows 8, have older hardware, or are just used to the XP interface.

To these people, ZDNet humbly offers Linux Mint as a suggestion to replace XP.

They provide fairly compelling arguments to their target audience like:
- You can make it look almost exactly like XP
- It's free
- You can boot the live CD to try before you "buy".
- Decent, free alternatives exist for email, office, book-keeping and web-browsing.
- Virtually no need for any anti-virus for home users.
- Installation is quite easy these days.
- Works on fairly modest hardwar

Ending free support for a 12 year old product seems like a sensible policy for a for-profit entity like microsoft. In the past they've been able to count on people upgrading from old microsoft products to new microsoft products, and so any measure that would encourage (or pressure) people to upgrade would increase their sales.

Seems like a winning formula.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Linux Mint as Mainstream Replacement for XP | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 1000 moderator points   | 117 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 1) by pjbgravely on Monday March 31 2014, @10:28AM

    by pjbgravely (1681) <pjbgravelyNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Monday March 31 2014, @10:28AM (#23582) Homepage
    why would anyone buy a computer in 98, 99,and 2 in 2000, that is assuming he didn't buy xp in 2001. Windows 98, 98 SE, ME and 2000. No wonder they posted as a coward.

  • (Score: 2) by Foobar Bazbot on Monday March 31 2014, @12:28PM

    by Foobar Bazbot (37) on Monday March 31 2014, @12:28PM (#23634)

    why would anyone buy a computer in 98, 99,and 2 in 2000, that is assuming he didn't buy xp in 2001. Windows 98, 98 SE, ME and 2000.

    Someone who has multiple computers running at once (e.g. my computer, spouse's computer, family/kids computer, htpc), but only replaces one at a time?

    It's a bit of a stretch, but not implausible.