Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by Subsentient on Wednesday March 18 2015, @07:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the a-million-monkeys-typing-on-a-million-typewriters dept.

The National Archives are asking for volunteers to transcribe thousands of pages of declassified CIA documents. The endeavour is part of Sunshine Week, which is an open-government initiative started by a group of newspaper editors to educate people about the importance of government transparency and the dangers of excessive state secrecy.

You can browse some of the raw documents here.

[Editor's Note: The dates on most of the CIA documents are 25 years old or older, so perhaps are of more interest to amateur historians than government transparency watchdogs.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:01AM

    by janrinok (52) on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:01AM (#28293) Journal

    This is an exceptionally good post. Well researched and exquisitely presented.

    --
    It's always my fault...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:03AM

    by janrinok (52) on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:03AM (#28294) Journal

    It said this was mainly a result of weak growth in earnings for those in work, but it said tax increases and benefit cuts, as part of the government's actions to reduce the deficit, had also had a negative impact on average incomes.

    --
    It's always my fault...
    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by mrcoolbp on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:35AM

      by mrcoolbp (68) <mrcoolbp@dev.soylentnews.org> on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:35AM (#28299)

      You are out of line sir!

      --
      (Score:1^½, Radical)
      • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:37AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:37AM (#28301)

        You sir are a poo poo head

        • (Score: 3, Interesting) by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:50AM

          by janrinok (52) on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:50AM (#28306) Journal

          What will be galling to both Labour and Tories is that the IFS also faces two ways on the contentious question of whether inequality of income has worsened since the Crash.

          --
          It's always my fault...
        • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:55AM

          by janrinok (52) on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:55AM (#28308) Journal

          It says that if you assume that inflation is the same for all households, then income inequality is lower in 2014-15 then in 2007-08 - largely because of those steep rises in benefit payments in 2008 and 2009 that I mentioned earlier.

          --
          It's always my fault...
      • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:49AM

        by janrinok (52) on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:49AM (#28305) Journal

        It says that the prime culprit is the UK's hard-to-explain woeful productivity performance - lacklustre rises in the output of workers - which has meant that significant wage rises have been unaffordable.

        --
        It's always my fault...
      • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:59AM

        by janrinok (52) on Wednesday March 04 2015, @11:59AM (#28310) Journal

        But in practice, it says, inflation between 2007 and 2010 was more pernicious for the poor than the rich, because of steep rises in food and energy prices which gobble up a disproportionately large portion of the incomes of the poorest.

        --
        It's always my fault...