Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by Dopefish on Wednesday February 19 2014, @09:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the hopefully-not-paying-lip-service dept.

Fluffeh writes:

"When the D.C. U.S. Court of Appeals struck down the FCC's Open Internet Rules, a White House Petition was put up to 'direct the FCC to classify ISPs as "common carriers"'. With over 100k signatures, there is now an official response.

Absent net neutrality, the Internet could turn into a high-priced private toll road that would be inaccessible to the next generation of visionaries. The resulting decline in the development of advanced online apps and services would dampen demand for broadband and ultimately discourage investment in broadband infrastructure. An open Internet removes barriers to investment worldwide.

The petition asked that the President direct the FCC to reclassify Internet service providers as "common carriers" which, if upheld, would give the FCC a distinct set of regulatory tools to promote net neutrality. The FCC is an independent agency. Chairman Wheeler has publicly pledged to use the full authority granted by Congress to maintain a robust, free and open Internet a principle that this White House vigorously supports."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by clone141166 on Wednesday February 19 2014, @09:44AM

    by clone141166 (59) on Wednesday February 19 2014, @09:44AM (#2432)

    I like that everyone is committed (quite a number of times according to the petition response), but nobody has actually decided to DO anything about it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Funny=2, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by nukkel on Wednesday February 19 2014, @09:57AM

    by nukkel (168) on Wednesday February 19 2014, @09:57AM (#2449)

    In politics, "is committed to" means "doesn't understand what all the fuss is about but has not (yet) been bribed to do the opposite"...