Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

Who Is the Crowd?

posted by LaminatorX on Thursday February 20 2014, @03:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the madness-of-crowds dept.

captain normal writes:

An essay by Robert W.Lucky in IEEE Spectrum, 'Who is the Crowd?', discusses how the internet has provided the means for many people to contribute to knowledge.
From the essay:

I look at my computer screen and imagine all the murmuring voices behind it, clamoring for attention. There is almost a mystical presence out there, not from aliens but from something almost as thrilling and unexpected--a new presence that has been brought about as a consequence of the enveloping architecture of the Internet.
...
The crowd has wisdom, knowing things that may not be known to individuals. It has sentiments, beliefs, and feelings that can be abstracted and analyzed. Moreover, it has the power to affect the real physical world...Small armies of volunteers and paid contributors can be assembled on a moment's notice to work on projects.

I find this very much like this current project here on SoylentNews. This is a 'Crowd' thing. Not a top down organization like the old 19th ~ 20th century organization model."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Who Is the Crowd? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 1000 moderator points   | 18 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 1) by dbot on Thursday February 20 2014, @04:29PM

    by dbot (1811) on Thursday February 20 2014, @04:29PM (#3676)

    ...I think that was what prompted the Beta changes to /. They wanted to "simplify" away all the features that made the community so contentious, because having people actually expressing opinions and arguing was just so ... messy.

    I disagree. I don't think the intention was malicious at all. More likely someone new (to the organization) had to leave their fingerprint on it.

    Thoughts about discussion on the site, I'm sure, were absent.

  • (Score: 1) by akinliat on Thursday February 20 2014, @04:48PM

    by akinliat (1898) <akinliatNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Thursday February 20 2014, @04:48PM (#3685)

    Oh no, I'm not saying there was any malice in it whatsoever. I don't doubt for a minute that they honestly believed it to be an improvement. It's just a that there are a large number of people who view any public argument as objectionable. By making the site as bland and boring as possible, I'm sure they believed they were making it "more accessible to a wider audience."

    Personally, I find such an attitude purely moronic, but I imagine that they'd find me a disruptive and undesirable influence, and are perfectly happy to see me gone.