dbot writes
"In the latest turn in an ongoing legal dispute, Canadian ISP TekSavvy has been ordered to hand over the IP addresses information of subscribers allegedly engaging in copyright infringement of Voltage Pictures works.
While it doesn't look like a great decision on the surface (an IP address does not uniquely identify an infringer), the court specifically said it wants to sign off on the wording of any contact notices issued by Voltage to prevent extortionary "Copyright Troll" messages. It will be interesting to see if this new decision scales."
(Score: 5, Interesting) by Terence on Friday February 21 2014, @08:35PM
About 2 years ago Canada got a updated copyright law. It was worded and and sold to the public as a balance between protecting copyrights and protecting private users. One way they did this by limiting damages awards to $100 to $5000 per claim against personal use.
So the court is making Voltage get their notification letters approved (so there's no trolling for excessive early settlements) and has suggested if they do bring individuals to court they shouldn't expect anywhere near the maximum $5000 per claim.
I think if Voltage starts doing the math, they'll realize this is a money losing proposition, and just go away. Which is exactly how I understood the law was supposed to work.
So, nicely done.
I value your opinion as much as the next person. Unfortunately the other person doesn't give a shit what you think.
(Score: 4, Informative) by Appalbarry on Friday February 21 2014, @08:41PM
Don't know why the summary at top didn't say it, but what was really noteworthy was that the court specifically identified copyright trolls as a problem, and set out restrictions on their activities.
In Canada, at least, your average copyright troll can no longer make enough profit to be successful
(Score: 4, Informative) by T0T4L_L43R on Friday February 21 2014, @11:58PM
Well it isn't in the summary, but it is in the link to Michael Geist's (pretty frikken excellent) article.
We have our share of problems up here in The Great White North, but lawsuites for fun and profit are not amoung them - hell, even our sad litle neo-con government despises them.
From TFA:
>the case will be managed by a Case Management Judge
>TekSavvy will only disclose subscriber name and address information
>Voltage will pay all reasonable legal costs incurred by TekSavvy before the release of any information
>the demand letter to subscribers will include a copy of the court order and clearly state in bold type that "no court has yet made a determination that such subscriber has infringed or is liable in any way for payment of damage".
>the contents of the demand letter will be approved by the parties (including CIPPIC) and the Case Management Judge.
>any further cases brought against subscribers will also be case managed
>the information released by TekSavvy will remain confidential, will not be disclosed to other parties, and will not be used for other purposes. The information will not be disclosed to the general public or the media.
Agree. They're doing it right.
(Score: 1) by Absinth on Friday February 21 2014, @08:44PM
Ruling allows for personal customer information to be released upon court's request. Voltage goes and pays for that data first and then what about seeding? Can it be seen as unlawful distribution of copyrighted material? In Canada you can't get charged for substance abuse but it's a whole other game if you distribute it.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by harmar on Friday February 21 2014, @09:48PM
Some other interesting tidbits in another article (http://www.cp24.com/news/canadian-isp-to-name-sub scribers-linked-to-alleged-downloading-of-films-1. 1697618#ixzz2tz9lnaAG [cp24.com])