Dev.SN ♥ developers
Sections
Dev.SN
posted by
mattie_p
on Saturday February 22 2014, @02:32PM
from the so-i-can-play-my-games-faster-right? dept.
from the so-i-can-play-my-games-faster-right? dept.
Popeidol writes
"Intel has announced the latest revision to it's Enterprise CPU range. The Xeon E7 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge rather than the aging Westmere, and specifically targets the Big Data Analytics market. In pursuit of this they've bumped up the core count to 15, reduced power consumption, reworked the cache, and included a long list of smaller improvements. The end result is a high-reliability chip that uses less power but has dramatically improved performance for most workloads.
A single-page version of the article is available here."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Intel Announces New 15-core Enterprise CPU
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 1000 moderator points
| 18 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I'm not a robot like you. I don't like having disks crammed into me... unless they're Oreos, and then only in the mouth.
-- Fry
(Score: 5, Interesting) by FatPhil on Saturday February 22 2014, @02:46PM
Something says they put 16 on, but expect one to be flawed, so do testing until they find the weak one, and disable it. (Nothing new about that, the old 486SXs were just DX's which had failed FPU tests, and had them disabled by e-fuse. I think AMD did some 3-core chips more recently which were 4-cores with the duff one disabled.)
Making a public pledge to no longer contribute to slashdot
(Score: 4, Insightful) by hemocyanin on Saturday February 22 2014, @03:07PM
Ah the memories -- I had a 486sx20 once upon a time. I thought it rocked too. You get more power in a feature phone nowadays.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by isostatic on Saturday February 22 2014, @04:13PM
My SX25 fell by the wayside when I tried to get Windows 95 installed on it. Had to compress the hard drive too, as it was only 170MB. Replaced it with a DX4-100 then my first homebuilt PC - a P2-300
When I buy servers now, I tend to spec low cores high CPU - x264 encoding is the only thing that really taxes what are in effect nas drives, currently that would be a single E5-2637 V2. 4 cores, 3.5GHz [intel.com]
However most servers serve multiple people, and run multiple threads, and can make use of wide processors. My favoured vendor suggests putting some 12-core processors in. Even on the storage chasis I go for, with two physical processors, that's 24 cores, it's a phenominally wide system. I do wonder how many systems can make use of that number of cores, but can't be easilly parallelised onto multiple cheaper machines. 6x4 core machines are in most cases going to be cheaper than a 24 core machine.
(Score: 5, Informative) by kebes on Saturday February 22 2014, @03:21PM
You're of course right that manufacturers sell partially-functional chips at lower cost. So we will probably see cheaper versions of this chip (e.g. with only 12 of the cores enabled).
(Score: 1) by TheGratefulNet on Sunday February 23 2014, @05:05PM
aha - that must be what people mean by 'the intel sees damage and routes around it'.
"It is now safe to switch off your computer."