Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by Dopefish on Monday February 24 2014, @11:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the money-in-the-mattress dept.

mrbluze writes:

"An interesting blog post by Charles Hugh Smith on Why Banks Are Doomed: Technology and Risk.:

The funny thing about technology is that those threatened by fundamental improvements in technology attempt to harness it to save their industry from extinction. For example, overpriced colleges now charge thousands of dollars for nearly costless massively open online courses (MOOCs) because they retain a monopoly on accreditation (diplomas). Once students are accredited directly--an advancement enabled by technology--colleges' monopoly disappears and so does their raison d'etre.

The same is true of banks. Now that accounting and risk assessment are automated, and borrowers and owners of capital can exchange funds in transparent digital marketplaces, there is no need for banks. But according to banks, only they have the expertise to create riskless debt.

...

One last happy thought: technology cannot be put back in the bottle. The financial/banking sector wants to use technology to increase its middleman skim, but the technology that is already out of the bottle will dismantle the sector as a function of what technology enables: faster, better, cheaper, with greater transparency, fairness and the proper distribution of risk.

There may well be a place for credit unions and community banks in the spectrum of exchanges, but these localized, decentralized enterprises would be unable to amass dangerous concentrations of risk and political influence in a truly transparent and decentralized system of exchanges.

It's still early days, but can new electronic currencies such as Bitcoin become mainstream without the assent of governments?"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by scruffybeard on Monday February 24 2014, @02:50PM

    by scruffybeard (533) on Monday February 24 2014, @02:50PM (#6052)

    Your description of how the system works is right. The article rambled too much for me to understand it, but the author generally asserts the premise that banks are dead, and everything can be crowd sourced. How the heck am I going to crowd source the loan on my house or my car? Do I list 1000 creditors as having a lien on the title? What recourse does someone have if I fail to pay them back, meaning will it be worth it to them to take me to court over the $100 they loaned me so I could buy a $40k car? I believe that technology will change how we interact with banks, and perhaps some of their functions, but they are going to be around for a very long time.