AnonTechie writes:
"New Scientist reviews Vikram Chandra's 'In Geek Sublime.'
From the article:
In 1975, Austrian-born physicist Fritjof Capra published an unlikely bestseller that explored the parallels between ideas in particle physics and Eastern mysticism. The Tao of Physics became a cult classic, selling over a million copies globally. Despite positive reviews, the book left many readers ultimately unsatisfied and unconvinced. In Geek Sublime, Vikram Chandra draws similar parallels between the process of writing computer code and some of the Indian philosophical systems that have profoundly influenced art, literature and poetry in the subcontinent, but which remain largely unknown in the West."
(Score: 4, Informative) by Foobar Bazbot on Tuesday February 25 2014, @04:02AM
Here the title is "In Geek Sublime". (And the punctuation follows the US-traditional, yet highly illogical, convention, which I refuse to honor.)
Here "In" serves as a preposition (and is only capitalized because it starts a sentence), and the title is "Geek Sublime".
A skim of TFA reveals that "Geek Sublime" is the correct title. Perhaps the capitialization of "In" threw someone off...
userscript: Expand/Collapse buttons on every comment [userscripts.org]