Dev.SN ♥ developers
Sections
Dev.SN
from the what-happens-underground-stays-underground dept.
girlwhowaspluggedout writes:
"The US Border Patrol has a new tool in its battle against the tunnels that are used to smuggle in drugs from Mexico. Since the cartels' diggers operate outside the range of the agency's cameras, motions detectors, and drones, and because filling the tunnels with concrete hasn't stopped the smugglers, the US Border Patrol now regularly employs robots to search through the underground drug trafficking routes.
The Border Patrol operates four remote-controlled robots along the US-Mexico border. Three of the four are assigned to its station in Nogales, Arizona, the final destination for most of the tunnels that have been discovered so far near the southern border. The agency's robots, which include Applied Research Associates' Pointman Tactical Robot and Inuktun Services' Versatrax 300, can easily fit in closed quarters. The tunnel that the Border Patrol shut down last month, for example though it was equipped with electric lighting, ventilation fans, and wood shoring was only 3 feet and high 2 feet wide. It spanned a whopping 481 feet, the largest tunnel discovered in Nogales by the Border Patrol.
The robots' ability to travel through areas where the air is unsafe to breath for extended periods is especially valuable in Nogales, AZ, whose popularity with drug smugglers is due to its sewer system, which is easily accessible from the adjacent city of Heroica Nogales, Mexico."
(Score: 4, Informative) by VLM on Tuesday February 25 2014, @10:04AM
GPR is no joke technologically. The powers required are crazy, the antenna size to get decent resolution is crazy, the T/R switch speeds required are crazy. Its pretty cutting edge as it is so no great surprise that trying to "GI proof" and miniaturize it are not going well.
Better idea is use traditional geologist seismic detection. And if the explosions collapse a few tunnels, well, what of it?
The most effective, cheapest, and safest way to end smuggling and pyramids of severed heads and all that would just be to legalize it. Legalize it all. For the harmless stuff there's no harm so who cares, and for the harmful stuff speed Darwinism along its inevitable course. Too many people in power making too much money on both sides, of course.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by TheLink on Tuesday February 25 2014, @12:01PM
They put small timers in jail for laundering magnitudes less (or for installing secret compartments into cars), but when it's billions, the banks just get fines they can bear. Who in HSBC, Wachovia, etc is in jail for laundering all that money?
Without those billions of laundered money the piles of severed heads would be much smaller - not as much money to pay for all the armies and wars. Those bankers and their friends really have blood on their hands.
(Score: 2) by mcgrew on Tuesday February 25 2014, @03:23PM
Of course they don't want to stop it, dry up their cash cow? The people who are vehemently against legalizing and regulating drugs are those who profit from their illegality. I wonder how much campaign cash has been funneled to US politicians by the cartels, who would be out of business if drugs were legal? Or by bankers who launder the drug money? Or owners of private prisons?
Free Nobots! [mcgrewbooks.com]
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 25 2014, @03:30PM
and for the harmful stuff speed Darwinism along its inevitable course
http://www.literature.org/authors/dickens-charles/ christmas-carol/chapter-01.html [literature.org]
"If they would rather die they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population."
wow...