Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by LaminatorX on Wednesday February 26 2014, @07:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the studies-show-poverty-causes-cancer dept.

Angry Jesus writes:

"The Chicago Police Department is mis-applying epidemiological science (the study of entire populations) to target individuals in a real-life version of Minority Report. They have decided that it is a good idea to put people on a secret list based on a Big Data analysis of their social networks. But don't worry, it isn't racist or abusive because, Science!"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by demonlapin on Wednesday February 26 2014, @08:43PM

    by demonlapin (925) on Wednesday February 26 2014, @08:43PM (#7677) Journal
    From TFA:

    22-year-old high school dropout

    hadn't committed a crime or interacted with a police officer recently

    he didn't have a violent criminal record, nor any gun violations.

    Emphasis added. That looks like a pretty straightforward criminal profile: guy who has committed property crimes in the past, high likelihood he'll be a repeat offender. In fact, I heard about just this sort of program being used in High Point, NC, on NPR [npr.org] last month. And they were very positive about it. They even talked about how Chicago was going to try to implement it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Underrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 27 2014, @10:47AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 27 2014, @10:47AM (#7970)

    I parsed that sentence differently:

    "hadn't (committed a crime) or (interacted with a police officer recently)"

    • (Score: 1) by demonlapin on Thursday February 27 2014, @09:19PM

      by demonlapin (925) on Thursday February 27 2014, @09:19PM (#8196) Journal
      If your reading were correct, they would not have had to say "did not have a violent criminal record". They would just have said "did not have a criminal record".