Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by janrinok on Friday February 28 2014, @03:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the Are-you-sure-this-will-work dept.

germanbird writes:

"ArsTechnica has published a story taking a look at NASA's theoretical rescue plan for the space shuttle Columbia. The ambitious yet plausible plan was included as part of the report prepared during the investigation after the shuttle was lost during re-entry. I appreciate the author's perspective and his analysis of things as a sys-admin at Boeing he was much closer to the situation than most of us were. I for one would have liked to see the men and women at NASA given the chance to try to pull this one off, but I'm not sure it would have been worth the risk to the rescue team or even possible given the compressed schedule."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by quacking duck on Friday February 28 2014, @09:11PM

    by quacking duck (1395) on Friday February 28 2014, @09:11PM (#8918)

    Some in NASA suspected a more serious problem and wanted to request help from the US military for some visual inspection by spy satellites, but no formal request was made:

    "Wayne Hale, a senior flight director now serving as launch integration manager at the Kennedy Space Center, made inquiries about the possibility of Air Force help inspecting Columbia. But those initial efforts were terminated by senior management"

    http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/03031 4readdy/ [spaceflightnow.com]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2