very good point! Having a private server bound to this service kind of defeats the purpose of having an independent back channel.
I'm not sure where you got the impression I was saying anything in that direction, at all.
single point of failure because of dependent backchannel vs. independent backchannel...
Yes yes, you implied exactly that.
Correct. I misinterpreted what was being said.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 12 2014, @12:59PM
very good point! Having a private server bound to this service kind of defeats the purpose of having an independent back channel.
(Score: 2) by xlefay on Wednesday March 12 2014, @01:53PM
I'm not sure where you got the impression I was saying anything in that direction, at all.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 13 2014, @04:12AM
single point of failure because of dependent backchannel vs. independent backchannel...
Yes yes, you implied exactly that.
(Score: 2) by xlefay on Thursday March 13 2014, @04:15PM
Correct. I misinterpreted what was being said.