Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by janrinok on Sunday March 23 2014, @09:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the welcome-to-the-1980s-again dept.

el_oscuro writes:

"In a bizarre twist to the usual failed government IT projects, the Washington Post reports:

Deep in an underground mine in Boyers, Pa., amid 28,000 file cabinets, government workers process the retirement files of federal employees. On paper. By hand. In 2014. This is one of the weirdest workplaces in the U.S. government both for where it is and for what it does. Here, inside the caverns of an old Pennsylvania limestone mine, there are 600 employees of the Office of Personnel Management. Their task is nothing top-secret. It is to process the retirement papers of the government's own workers. But that system has a spectacular flaw. It still must be done entirely by hand, and almost entirely on paper.

'The need for automation was clear in 1981,' said James W. Morrison Jr., who oversaw the retirement-processing system under President Ronald Reagan. In a telephone interview this year, Morrison recalled his horror upon learning that the system was all run on paper: 'After a year, I thought, God, my reputation will be ruined if we don't fix this.'"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by unitron on Sunday March 23 2014, @09:26AM

    by unitron (70) on Sunday March 23 2014, @09:26AM (#19932) Journal

    ...but horribly written--wandered all over the place before it ever got around to talking about what the article's supposed to be about.

    --
    something something Slashcott something something Beta something something
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by el_oscuro on Sunday March 23 2014, @09:31PM

    by el_oscuro (1711) on Sunday March 23 2014, @09:31PM (#20032)

    We are talking about the Washington Post. This classifies as a good article for them. At least it still better the New York Times...