Anonymous Coward writes:
"Dan Luu, in his blog, suggests that editing binaries is something that we should consider from time to time. From that blog:
Editing binaries is a trick that comes in handy a few times a year. You don't often need to, but when you do, there's no alternative. When I mention patching binaries, I get one of two reactions: complete shock or no reaction at all. As far as I can tell, this is because most people have one of these two models of the world:
- There exists source code. Compilers do something to source code to make it runnable. If you change the source code, different things happen.
- There exists a processor. The processor takes some bits and decodes them to make things happen. If you change the bits, different things happen.
If you have the first view, breaking out a hex editor to modify a program is the action of a deranged lunatic. If you have the second view, editing binaries is the most natural thing in the world. Why wouldn't you just edit the binary?"
(Score: 2) by Reziac on Monday March 24 2014, @10:49PM
DOOM and DEHacked. ;)
I've assaulted a binary with a hex editor a few times myself. I'm not a coder but sometimes it's not rocket science to figure out what part you want to change or do away with. I recall a BBS utility that insisted on calling a bunch of crappy external .COMs that were actually an early form of adware, and the util would bitch and moan if they weren't there. I rooted around in it til I found the filenames, killed all the strings, and the problem went away.
And I made my copy of Blue Wave call itself variously Cold Wave and CrimeWave. :)
Then again, I think it's perfectly normal to view binaries with Vern Buerg's LIST.