Anonymous Coward writes:
"Dan Luu, in his blog, suggests that editing binaries is something that we should consider from time to time. From that blog:
Editing binaries is a trick that comes in handy a few times a year. You don't often need to, but when you do, there's no alternative. When I mention patching binaries, I get one of two reactions: complete shock or no reaction at all. As far as I can tell, this is because most people have one of these two models of the world:
- There exists source code. Compilers do something to source code to make it runnable. If you change the source code, different things happen.
- There exists a processor. The processor takes some bits and decodes them to make things happen. If you change the bits, different things happen.
If you have the first view, breaking out a hex editor to modify a program is the action of a deranged lunatic. If you have the second view, editing binaries is the most natural thing in the world. Why wouldn't you just edit the binary?"
(Score: 2) by sjames on Tuesday March 25 2014, @03:08AM
I did a lot of that on C64 and Apple][. At some point, hacking the game became more fun than playing the game. While the developers intended for the player to eventually win the game, the challenge I enjoyed was one they intended me to lose. That made it way better when I won and the game did what I wanted.
I learned a lot about the PC architecture by boot code tracing games.