Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by Dopefish on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the why-deny-reality? dept.
Blackmoore writes: "The producers of "House of Numbers" have used a series of bogus copyright takedown notices to get Youtube to remove videos, in which he uses clips from the documentary as part of his criticism, showing how they mislead viewers and misrepresent the facts and the evidence. It's pure censorship: using the law to force the removal of your opponents' views."
 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by unitron on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:58PM

    by unitron (70) on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:58PM (#341) Journal

    ...someone who has it and claims they don't, or someone who, for whatever bizarre reason, claims that there's no such thing?

    --
    something something Slashcott something something Beta something something
  • (Score: 1) by Blackmoore on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:13PM

    by Blackmoore (57) on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:13PM (#348) Journal

    "well, i dont know anyone who's died from aids, it must be a scam."

    infuriates me. I've lost people to that.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by romanr on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:49PM

    by romanr (102) on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:49PM (#358)

    The aids deniers in the "documentary" claim that there is not enough evidence about HIV and its link to AIDS, so they more or less claim, that HIV/AIDS is a myth.

  • (Score: 1) by VLM on Monday February 17 2014, @08:48AM

    by VLM (445) on Monday February 17 2014, @08:48AM (#633)

    Its the HIV AIDS version of the guy who walks around saying "correlation isn't causation" constantly.

    One is a virus. The other is a vast array of inevitably fatal symptoms. Its accidentally a remarkably insightful observation, because it does seem true that a huge quantity of dangerous and expensive drugs can reduce or eliminate the causation regardless of the correlation. Or in summary, its possible to reduce or eliminate the symptoms without getting rid of the seemingly unkillable virus.

    Most of the time for most people, rather than being a scientific observation, it just means the denier is a complete nutcase. That's also merely a correlation, not a causation.