Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by mrcoolbp on Wednesday March 26 2014, @12:36AM   Printer-friendly
from the we-are-slightly-less-screwed dept.

Sir Garlon writes:

According to the New York Times,

The Obama administration is preparing to unveil a legislative proposal for a far-reaching overhaul of the National Security Agency's once-secret bulk phone records program in a way that ... would end its systematic collection of data about Americans' calling habits. The bulk records would stay in the hands of phone companies, which would not be required to retain the data for any longer than they normally would. And the N.S.A. could obtain specific records only with permission from a judge, using a new kind of court order.

The Times' characterization of this as a "far-reaching overhaul" seems overstated, as the details of the proposal involve moving custody of the phone records from the NSA to the phone companies, and shortens retention time from five years to 18 months. The EPIC, ACLU, and EFF spokespersons quoted in the article reacted with guarded approval.

If submitted as planned, the bill would still need to pass the US House of Representatives and Senate.

According to EPIC, the NSA phone-records surveillance program is scheduled to end (in its current form) this Friday, though the Times article says President Obama plans to extend that deadline.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by mendax on Wednesday March 26 2014, @12:39AM

    by mendax (2840) on Wednesday March 26 2014, @12:39AM (#21331)

    I'll believe it when I see it.

    As I understand the situation, Obama, the constitutional scholar, believes that the NSA program is constitutional but wants the NSA to stop what it's doing because of public outrage. But I have little confidence in Obama anymore (and I voted for the bastard).

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=3, Interesting=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by JeanCroix on Wednesday March 26 2014, @09:43AM

    by JeanCroix (573) on Wednesday March 26 2014, @09:43AM (#21488)

    I'll believe it when I see it.

    That's just the thing - we won't see it. By its very nature, all we can do is take their word for it. And I think it's apparent what their word is worth.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by davester666 on Wednesday March 26 2014, @01:37PM

      by davester666 (155) on Wednesday March 26 2014, @01:37PM (#21613)

      believe me. we aren't getting a secret court to issue secret warrants that businesses which receive them can't tell anybody they received.

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Phoenix666 on Wednesday March 26 2014, @09:50AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Wednesday March 26 2014, @09:50AM (#21494)

    I agree this is smoke and mirrors. It's giving the illusion of change while effecting no change at all. The only sign that they're serious about real change that matters is putting the heads of the NSA and CIA in prison, prosecuting everyone in the rank and file involved with torture and unconstitutional surveillance, severely cutting the funding to those agencies, and for all the schmucks in Congress supposedly providing oversight of the intelligence agencies to wind up on the street or in prison. Short of that, nope, sorry, they all deserve to burn.