Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by janrinok on Wednesday March 26 2014, @01:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the phone-without-cheezburgers dept.

moylan writes:

An article from the Chicago Tribune discusses people who are changing their smartphone for a dumbphone. From the article:

When Ryan Gleeson punches out a text message or takes a call on his cellphone at parties, he prepares to hear questions from onlookers, and sometimes snickers. That's because the 24-year-old carries a $50 flip phone - the Samsung Gusto 2. There's no touch screen or apps. No Web browsing capabilities. No collection of music to enjoy through earbuds.

"Definitely it's like a black sheep in the room when I pull it out," said Gleeson, a postproduction associate at a documentary production house in Lincoln Park. "I work with a lot of Apple people - creative types. Everyone has an iPhone." Gleeson is among cellphone users who choose to be dialled out of the world of iPhones, BlackBerrys and Androids. In an increasingly connected and accessible culture, these stalwarts have chosen hand-held devices that offer only the basics, despite the social isolation and limitations that may come with them.

For Gleeson, hanging up the iPhone demonstrates no "grand realization about humanity," he said; rather, it's a way to tamp down his compulsive email checking. With the basic phone, "It's a lot easier now to just step away and say, 'I'm not going to work right now,'" he said.

[...a survey] found that 35 percent of U.S. adults carry a cellphone that is not a smartphone.

As someone who got rid of an iphone and android device and replaced them with 2 feature phones I thought I was in the minority. But I have noticed more and more folk around carrying a second dumbphone for when the battery goes on their smartphone. Anyone else doing this?"

[Editor: Yes, me!]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheGratefulNet on Wednesday March 26 2014, @07:25PM

    by TheGratefulNet (659) on Wednesday March 26 2014, @07:25PM (#21810)

    a receive-only gps is definitely more private! agreed.

    but then I have to carry a 2nd box and also keep it updated. if I have to carry a voice phone, anyway, its hard to justify extra boxes.

    this is why for most people, mp3 players are now dead, cameras are now dead, pda's are totally dead, microcassette recorders are dead, etc. all purpose-built things are better; but they take up more room and power and cost money.

    smart phones have the worst apps compared to purpose-built things, but the convenience factor of having just one box is what makes them sell and be so popular.

    if I did have a 'infinite updates' garmin in my car, I'd use that over my phone; but if I have to buy a new box to get these infinite updates, that is a non-solution when my phone is already there and working and cost of app is zero.

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2