Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by LaminatorX on Sunday March 30 2014, @12:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the Honesty-is-the-best-policy dept.

janrinok writes:

"CNet is reporting that Microsoft is hoping that users will not exploit a loophole which would save them $100 for an Office 365 subscription. But it is not as straightforward as it might appear as there are a few twists to the tale. From the article:

Microsoft wants you to buy Office 365, making the $100 subscription service mandatory to access the full power of Office apps for iPad. But if you don't want to pay the price, you don't technically have to. After tinkering with numerous devices and accounts since the debut of Office on iPad Thursday, CNET discovered a loophole in how Office 365 authentication gets enforced on Apple tablets. The loophole allows users who have not paid for the subscription to enjoy the benefits of those tablet apps for iOS.

"Similar to our commercial use rights, we do not strictly enforce the limit on tablet installations, but trust that our users respect and understand the device limits outlined in the EULA [end user rights agreement]," a Microsoft spokesperson told CNET. Subscriptions now form the backbone of Microsoft's software licensing, and the company has made an aggressive push to make it as convenient as possible to access its Office app suite through an Office 365 subscription. It wants to turn one-time customers into annual ones, and users are signing up. Within hours of going live on Thursday, the apps grabbed the top four slots in the free category of Apple's top charts.

Sweetening the deal, Microsoft gives you for less than the price to buy the software outright for only one computer the ability to install Office on five Macs or PCs and up to five tablets. However, there's nothing to stop you from trying a sixth tablet, or a seventh or an eighth or beyond. For now, there is no set limitation.

Additionally:

Similar to sharing around an HBO Go password among friends, all that's required to exploit the loophole which, again, is against the rights agreement that limits you to authenticating only five tablets is to have someone with a valid Office 365 account log in to Word, Excel or any other Office app on iPad. Once that happens, the tablet is automatically authenticated for all Office apps and any future users, regardless of whether or not those users have paid for 365. In other words, someone with a Microsoft account that was, just minutes prior, unable to access the best features of an iPad Office app will then be able to utilize the full version as well as other downloaded Office apps seemingly indefinitely. The prompt to pay for 365 or resort to using the "read-only" mode disappears.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Immerman on Sunday March 30 2014, @04:31PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Sunday March 30 2014, @04:31PM (#23269)

    "But for now there is no set limitation"

    Since they just finished stating a a 5-tablet limit, that sounds to me like there is currently no *technical* limit, which is a very different thing than no *legal* limit.

    I suspect we all hate DRM here, so why are we touting articles highlighting the fact that the DRM is not as onerous as it could be and encouraging people to illegally exploit that fact?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by etherscythe on Monday March 31 2014, @01:12PM

    by etherscythe (937) on Monday March 31 2014, @01:12PM (#23660)

    A more positive interpretation is that we are highlighting a DRM flaw or "incomplete implementation with a loophole" that demonstrates that doing DRM is hard, and many products could be developed more cheaply or with better features/fewer bugs if only companies would quit throwing resources at the DRM which pirates just break anyway.

    Do you think Microsoft is opposed to as much DRM as they can get away with? Consider Games for Windows Live, XBOX firmware detection, and all the Windows Validation tech they have produced. It seems likely to me that, since they have focused on the Mac ecosystem only slightly more often than never, that this is just a measure meant to keep a working product, without showstopper bugs that will give their product a bad name. A great demonstration of backing off of DRM in favor of the user experience, at least temporarily.