Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

posted by mrbluze on Monday March 31 2014, @08:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the can't-resist-that-minty-freshness dept.

prospectacle writes:

How to best replace Windows XP has become interesting to a much wider group of people, due to the end of official support for the product. (a previous story mentioned an Indian state government that urged its departments to use India's home-grown linux distro "BOSS Linux").

Some people may be using XP because it came with their computer and they never gave it a second thought, but there are probably plenty of others who don't want to spend the money, don't like the look of Windows 8, have older hardware, or are just used to the XP interface.

To these people, ZDNet humbly offers Linux Mint as a suggestion to replace XP.

They provide fairly compelling arguments to their target audience like:
- You can make it look almost exactly like XP
- It's free
- You can boot the live CD to try before you "buy".
- Decent, free alternatives exist for email, office, book-keeping and web-browsing.
- Virtually no need for any anti-virus for home users.
- Installation is quite easy these days.
- Works on fairly modest hardwar

Ending free support for a 12 year old product seems like a sensible policy for a for-profit entity like microsoft. In the past they've been able to count on people upgrading from old microsoft products to new microsoft products, and so any measure that would encourage (or pressure) people to upgrade would increase their sales.

Seems like a winning formula.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Monday March 31 2014, @04:00PM

    by VLM (445) on Monday March 31 2014, @04:00PM (#23732)

    Do you still need itunes?

    I went thru the same mental gymnastics with my kids computer, back in the very oldest days of iDevices you Really needed a machine running itunes to operate an ipod touch / ipad but they changed things such that you only need itunes to initially activate, and I believe now you don't need itunes at all, iDevices seem to now be completely self contained. The iPads the school issued to my kids have never been sync'd to any PC/mac since they were issued. They come home with the kids so no one is secretly syncing all of them at school overnight. Everything is done on the device itself, installing apps, whatever.

    So its possible you no longer need itunes at all.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by emg on Monday March 31 2014, @04:12PM

    by emg (3464) on Monday March 31 2014, @04:12PM (#23734)

    Not sure. I don't think the iPod has wi-fi, so the only way to get music on it, at least proprietary stuff, is probably via iTunes.

    • (Score: 2) by VLM on Monday March 31 2014, @05:05PM

      by VLM (445) on Monday March 31 2014, @05:05PM (#23761)

      OK I see what you're getting at. A nano or shuffle or classic ipod would continue to require itunes...

      For some years I had an original PPC mac mini on my desk as a secondary machine, and perhaps something like that would run itunes. Or maybe you'd need a newer intel mac mini. It would be cheap, virus proof, and most importantly, something new and fun to fool around with.