Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Dev.SN ♥ developers

Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password


Site News

Join our Folding@Home team:
Main F@H site
Our team page


Funding Goal
For 6-month period:
2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30
(All amounts are estimated)
Base Goal:
$3500.00

Currently:
$3500.00
100.0%
Stretch Goal:
$2000.00

Currently:
$1254.52
62.7%

Covers transactions:
2020-01-01 00:00:00 ..
2020-06-30 21:00:33 UTC
(SPIDs: [1207..1407])
Last Update:
2020-07-01 02:02:58 UTC
--martyb


Support us: Subscribe Here
and buy SoylentNews Swag


We always have a place for talented people, visit the Get Involved section on the wiki to see how you can make SoylentNews better.

Poll

How often do you click through and read the fine article?

  • Almost all the time
  • More often than not
  • Less often than do
  • When the topic interests me
  • Very rarely
  • Never - it would go against long-standing traditions!
  • Click what?

[ Results | Polls ]
Comments:0 | Votes:2

Site Funding Progress

Funding Goal
For 6-month period:
2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30
(All amounts are estimated)
Base Goal:
$2000.00

Currently:
$126.74
6.4%

Covers transactions:
2020-01-01 00:00:00 ..
2020-01-31 06:46:05 UTC
(SPIDs: [1207..1216])
Last Update:
2020-01-31 12:48:47 UTC
--martyb

posted by martyb on Sunday December 11 2016, @09:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the please-post-no-comments dept.

This is a test story under which a carefully constructed set of comments have been made. It is intended to be used in testing the new comment layout code.

Please do not post any comments to it. Thanks!

The strategy is to: post a top-level comment, post a reply to that top-level comment, post a reply to the reply, post a reply to THAT reply, etc. until a depth [from top-level to lowest-level reply, inclusive] of 10 comments is reached.

Perform the same steps with another top-level comment and nine more replies.

Repeat making these depth-first trees until 20 top-level comments (and attendant replies) have been posted.

NOTE: I noticed, after I had already started, that the very first comment should have been comment_0000 — live and learn. That means that this story has 199 comments instead of the 200 that I had intended.

[Continues...]

Comment structure is laid out as follows:

CALL comment 0001
CALL comment 0002 --reply-to 0001
CALL comment 0003 --reply-to 0002
CALL comment 0004 --reply-to 0003
CALL comment 0005 --reply-to 0004
CALL comment 0006 --reply-to 0005
CALL comment 0007 --reply-to 0006
CALL comment 0008 --reply-to 0007
CALL comment 0009 --reply-to 0008

CALL comment 0010
CALL comment 0011 --reply-to 0010
CALL comment 0012 --reply-to 0011
CALL comment 0013 --reply-to 0012
CALL comment 0014 --reply-to 0013
CALL comment 0015 --reply-to 0014
CALL comment 0016 --reply-to 0015
CALL comment 0017 --reply-to 0016
CALL comment 0018 --reply-to 0017
CALL comment 0019 --reply-to 0018

CALL comment 0020
CALL comment 0021 --reply-to 0020
CALL comment 0022 --reply-to 0021
CALL comment 0023 --reply-to 0022
CALL comment 0024 --reply-to 0023
CALL comment 0025 --reply-to 0024
CALL comment 0026 --reply-to 0025
CALL comment 0027 --reply-to 0026
CALL comment 0028 --reply-to 0027
CALL comment 0029 --reply-to 0028

CALL comment 0030
CALL comment 0031 --reply-to 0030
CALL comment 0032 --reply-to 0031
CALL comment 0033 --reply-to 0032
CALL comment 0034 --reply-to 0033
CALL comment 0035 --reply-to 0034
CALL comment 0036 --reply-to 0035
CALL comment 0037 --reply-to 0036
CALL comment 0038 --reply-to 0037
CALL comment 0039 --reply-to 0038

CALL comment 0040
CALL comment 0041 --reply-to 0040
CALL comment 0042 --reply-to 0041
CALL comment 0043 --reply-to 0042
CALL comment 0044 --reply-to 0043
CALL comment 0045 --reply-to 0044
CALL comment 0046 --reply-to 0045
CALL comment 0047 --reply-to 0046
CALL comment 0048 --reply-to 0047
CALL comment 0049 --reply-to 0048

CALL comment 0050
CALL comment 0051 --reply-to 0050
CALL comment 0052 --reply-to 0051
CALL comment 0053 --reply-to 0052
CALL comment 0054 --reply-to 0053
CALL comment 0055 --reply-to 0054
CALL comment 0056 --reply-to 0055
CALL comment 0057 --reply-to 0056
CALL comment 0058 --reply-to 0057
CALL comment 0059 --reply-to 0058

CALL comment 0060
CALL comment 0061 --reply-to 0060
CALL comment 0062 --reply-to 0061
CALL comment 0063 --reply-to 0062
CALL comment 0064 --reply-to 0063
CALL comment 0065 --reply-to 0064
CALL comment 0066 --reply-to 0065
CALL comment 0067 --reply-to 0066
CALL comment 0068 --reply-to 0067
CALL comment 0069 --reply-to 0068

CALL comment 0070
CALL comment 0071 --reply-to 0070
CALL comment 0072 --reply-to 0071
CALL comment 0073 --reply-to 0072
CALL comment 0074 --reply-to 0073
CALL comment 0075 --reply-to 0074
CALL comment 0076 --reply-to 0075
CALL comment 0077 --reply-to 0076
CALL comment 0078 --reply-to 0077
CALL comment 0079 --reply-to 0078

CALL comment 0080
CALL comment 0081 --reply-to 0080
CALL comment 0082 --reply-to 0081
CALL comment 0083 --reply-to 0082
CALL comment 0084 --reply-to 0083
CALL comment 0085 --reply-to 0084
CALL comment 0086 --reply-to 0085
CALL comment 0087 --reply-to 0086
CALL comment 0088 --reply-to 0087
CALL comment 0089 --reply-to 0088

CALL comment 0090
CALL comment 0091 --reply-to 0090
CALL comment 0092 --reply-to 0091
CALL comment 0093 --reply-to 0092
CALL comment 0094 --reply-to 0093
CALL comment 0095 --reply-to 0094
CALL comment 0096 --reply-to 0095
CALL comment 0097 --reply-to 0096
CALL comment 0098 --reply-to 0097
CALL comment 0099 --reply-to 0098

CALL comment 0100
CALL comment 0101 --reply-to 0100
CALL comment 0102 --reply-to 0101
CALL comment 0103 --reply-to 0102
CALL comment 0104 --reply-to 0103
CALL comment 0105 --reply-to 0104
CALL comment 0106 --reply-to 0105
CALL comment 0107 --reply-to 0106
CALL comment 0108 --reply-to 0107
CALL comment 0109 --reply-to 0108

CALL comment 0110
CALL comment 0111 --reply-to 0110
CALL comment 0112 --reply-to 0111
CALL comment 0113 --reply-to 0112
CALL comment 0114 --reply-to 0113
CALL comment 0115 --reply-to 0114
CALL comment 0116 --reply-to 0115
CALL comment 0117 --reply-to 0116
CALL comment 0118 --reply-to 0117
CALL comment 0119 --reply-to 0118

CALL comment 0120
CALL comment 0121 --reply-to 0120
CALL comment 0122 --reply-to 0121
CALL comment 0123 --reply-to 0122
CALL comment 0124 --reply-to 0123
CALL comment 0125 --reply-to 0124
CALL comment 0126 --reply-to 0125
CALL comment 0127 --reply-to 0126
CALL comment 0128 --reply-to 0127
CALL comment 0129 --reply-to 0128

CALL comment 0130
CALL comment 0131 --reply-to 0130
CALL comment 0132 --reply-to 0131
CALL comment 0133 --reply-to 0132
CALL comment 0134 --reply-to 0133
CALL comment 0135 --reply-to 0134
CALL comment 0136 --reply-to 0135
CALL comment 0137 --reply-to 0136
CALL comment 0138 --reply-to 0137
CALL comment 0139 --reply-to 0138

CALL comment 0140
CALL comment 0141 --reply-to 0140
CALL comment 0142 --reply-to 0141
CALL comment 0143 --reply-to 0142
CALL comment 0144 --reply-to 0143
CALL comment 0145 --reply-to 0144
CALL comment 0146 --reply-to 0145
CALL comment 0147 --reply-to 0146
CALL comment 0148 --reply-to 0147
CALL comment 0149 --reply-to 0148

CALL comment 0150
CALL comment 0151 --reply-to 0150
CALL comment 0152 --reply-to 0151
CALL comment 0153 --reply-to 0152
CALL comment 0154 --reply-to 0153
CALL comment 0155 --reply-to 0154
CALL comment 0156 --reply-to 0155
CALL comment 0157 --reply-to 0156
CALL comment 0158 --reply-to 0157
CALL comment 0159 --reply-to 0158

CALL comment 0160
CALL comment 0161 --reply-to 0160
CALL comment 0162 --reply-to 0161
CALL comment 0163 --reply-to 0162
CALL comment 0164 --reply-to 0163
CALL comment 0165 --reply-to 0164
CALL comment 0166 --reply-to 0165
CALL comment 0167 --reply-to 0166
CALL comment 0168 --reply-to 0167
CALL comment 0169 --reply-to 0168

CALL comment 0170
CALL comment 0171 --reply-to 0170
CALL comment 0172 --reply-to 0171
CALL comment 0173 --reply-to 0172
CALL comment 0174 --reply-to 0173
CALL comment 0175 --reply-to 0174
CALL comment 0176 --reply-to 0175
CALL comment 0177 --reply-to 0176
CALL comment 0178 --reply-to 0177
CALL comment 0179 --reply-to 0178

CALL comment 0180
CALL comment 0181 --reply-to 0180
CALL comment 0182 --reply-to 0181
CALL comment 0183 --reply-to 0182
CALL comment 0184 --reply-to 0183
CALL comment 0185 --reply-to 0184
CALL comment 0186 --reply-to 0185
CALL comment 0187 --reply-to 0186
CALL comment 0188 --reply-to 0187
CALL comment 0189 --reply-to 0188

CALL comment 0190
CALL comment 0191 --reply-to 0190
CALL comment 0192 --reply-to 0191
CALL comment 0193 --reply-to 0192
CALL comment 0194 --reply-to 0193
CALL comment 0195 --reply-to 0194
CALL comment 0196 --reply-to 0195
CALL comment 0197 --reply-to 0196
CALL comment 0198 --reply-to 0197
CALL comment 0199 --reply-to 0198

posted by martyb on Friday December 09 2016, @09:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the Test-Story-#2-please-post-no-comments dept.

This is a test story for debugging the new comment layout code -- the comments are carefully crafted -- please post no comments. Thanks!

posted by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday December 02 2016, @09:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the fill-er-up dept.
This story needs over 200 comments. Preferably in a dozen or so threads. Get to work. A link here.
posted by martyb on Thursday December 01 2016, @09:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the POST-NO-COMMENTS dept.

This is a test story -- the layout and number of comments has been carefully crafted -- POST NO COMMENTS, Please!

posted by charon on Wednesday November 30 2016, @08:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-can-i-test-if-i-don't-have-fresh-material dept.

The Guardian:

Vladimir Putin gave his clearest signal yet that he aims to break up the global nature of the internet when he branded the network a "CIA project" on Thursday.

The Russian president told a media conference in St Petersburg that America's overseas espionage agency had originally set up the internet and was continuing to develop it.

Putin has long hinted that he wants a Russian-run alternative.


Original Submission

posted by charon on Tuesday November 29 2016, @01:36AM   Printer-friendly

Announced today on StarWars.com:

Actors John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Andy Serkis, Domhnall Gleeson, and Max von Sydow will join the original stars of the saga, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill, Anthony Daniels, Peter Mayhew, and Kenny Baker in the new film.

Director J.J. Abrams says, "We are so excited to finally share the cast of Star Wars: Episode VII. It is both thrilling and surreal to watch the beloved original cast and these brilliant new performers come together to bring this world to life, once again. We start shooting in a couple of weeks, and everyone is doing their best to make the fans proud."

Star Wars: Episode VII is being directed by J.J. Abrams from a screenplay by Lawrence Kasdan and Abrams. Kathleen Kennedy, J.J. Abrams, and Bryan Burk are producing, and John Williams returns as the composer. The movie opens worldwide on December 18, 2015.


Original Submission

I really like testing things.

I like it so much that even when I am able to edit things on the live production server, I still come back to test things on dev.

You may have noticed that I am typing.

That is because I like to type.

In fact, I like to type almost as much as I like to test.

But don't let this be all about me; please tell me what you like to do.

Do you like to test and type also?

If so, we could be friends.

posted by mrpg on Tuesday November 22 2016, @08:06PM   Printer-friendly

A robotic space plane is flying in Low Earth orbit and nobody knows why.

While intelligence gathering is widely regarded as the best explanation, no one can say for certain what it could be.

"That question implies that it has a single, rational mission. And I don't think it does," said John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org.

[...] The Secure World Foundation, a non-profit based in Broomfield, Colo., published a 2010 report on the craft. It speculated the space plane's most likely purpose was for intelligence gathering and said the vessel had a low probability of other uses, such as satellite repair.

Whatever its real purpose, the X-37B has very real capabilities. It travels low in orbit, staying around 177 to 804 kilometres above the Earth at a cruising speed of about 17,500mph (28,163kph).


Original Submission

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday November 22 2016, @04:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the I-recommend-that-you-start-drinking-heavily dept.

An outrageous, insightful, and sadly accurate commentary on programming, I found this an extremely entertaining read and agree with most of it. It doesn't offer solutions, but certainly highlights a lot of the problems.

"Double you tee eff?" you say, and start hunting for the problem. You discover that one day, some idiot decided that since another idiot decided that 1/0 should equal infinity, they could just use that as a shorthand for "Infinity" when simplifying their code. Then a non-idiot rightly decided that this was idiotic, which is what the original idiot should have decided, but since he didn't, the non-idiot decided to be a dick and make this a failing error in his new compiler. Then he decided he wasn't going to tell anyone that this was an error, because he's a dick, and now all your snowflakes are urine and you can't even find the cat.

Personally, I think things will only get better (including salaries) when software development is treated like other engineering disciplines.


Original Submission

posted by GreatOutdoors on Monday November 21 2016, @11:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the he-died-didn't-he dept.

Oklahoma inmate Clayton Lockett died during a botched execution [reuters.com] on Tuesday, minutes after a doctor had called a halt to the procedure, raising more questions about new death penalty cocktails used by the state and others. Thirteen minutes after a doctor administered a lethal injection at the state's death chamber in McAlester, Lockett lifted his head and started mumbling. The doctor halted the execution, said state corrections department spokesman Jerry Massie. Lockett died of an apparent massive heart attack about 40 minutes after the procedure started, he said. "We believe that a vein was blown and the drugs weren't working as they were designed to. The director ordered a halt to the execution," Massie said. The troubled execution was expected to have national implications, with lawyers for death row inmates having argued that new lethal injection cocktails used in Oklahoma and other states could cause undue suffering and violate constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment. [...]

[...]Oklahoma had set up a new lethal injection procedure and cocktail of chemicals earlier this year after it was no longer able to obtain the drugs it had once used for executions. "After weeks of Oklahoma refusing to disclose basic information about the drugs for tonight's lethal injection procedures, tonight Clayton Lockett was tortured to death," said Madeline Cohen, an attorney for Warner. Oklahoma and other states have been scrambling to find new suppliers and chemical combinations after drug makers, [nytimes.com] mostly in Europe, imposed sales bans because they objected to having medications made for other purposes being used in lethal injections.[...]

[...] Lockett, 38, was convicted of first-degree murder, rape, kidnapping and robbery [tulsaworld.com] for a 1999 crime spree with two co-defendants. He was found to have shot teen-ager Stephanie Nieman and buried her alive in a shallow grave where she eventually died.

Do you think this is torture, or simply a successful execution?
What alternative execution methods would you prefer to see?


Original Submission

posted by GreatOutdoors on Monday November 21 2016, @09:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the Google-don't-need-no-stinking-driver dept.

Google gives us an update on their latest self-driving car escapades. Make sure you check out the video in the article [blogspot.com] for a look at how the car handles various situations thrown at it.

Jaywalking pedestrians. Cars lurching out of hidden driveways. Double-parked delivery trucks blocking your lane and your view. At a busy time of day, a typical city street can leave even experienced drivers sweaty-palmed and irritable. We all dream of a world in which city centers are freed of congestion from cars circling for parking [accessmagazine.org] and have fewer intersections made dangerous by distracted drivers. That's why over the last year we've shifted the focus of the Google self-driving car project onto mastering city street driving.[...]

[...] We've improved our software so it can detect hundreds of distinct objects simultaneously-pedestrians, buses, a stop sign held up by a crossing guard, or a cyclist making gestures that indicate a possible turn. A self-driving vehicle can pay attention to all of these things in a way that a human physically can't-and it never gets tired or distracted.

Would you trust your kids crossing the road with autonomous cars driving in the area?
What if you had an emergency situation and needed the car to hurry up and get you to the hospital in a traffic jam?


Original Submission