Slash Boxes

Dev.SN ♥ developers

Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Site News

Join our Folding@Home team:
Main F@H site
Our team page

Funding Goal
For 6-month period:
2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30
(All amounts are estimated)
Base Goal:

Stretch Goal:


Covers transactions:
2020-01-01 00:00:00 ..
2020-06-30 21:00:33 UTC
(SPIDs: [1207..1407])
Last Update:
2020-07-01 02:02:58 UTC

Support us: Subscribe Here
and buy SoylentNews Swag

We always have a place for talented people, visit the Get Involved section on the wiki to see how you can make SoylentNews better.


How often do you click through and read the fine article?

  • Almost all the time
  • More often than not
  • Less often than do
  • When the topic interests me
  • Very rarely
  • Never - it would go against long-standing traditions!
  • Click what?

[ Results | Polls ]
Comments:0 | Votes:2

Site Funding Progress

Funding Goal
For 6-month period:
2020-01-01 to 2020-06-30
(All amounts are estimated)
Base Goal:


Covers transactions:
2020-01-01 00:00:00 ..
2020-01-31 06:46:05 UTC
(SPIDs: [1207..1216])
Last Update:
2020-01-31 12:48:47 UTC

posted by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday August 24 2020, @11:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the douchebag dept.

Test comments with Preview here.


AutoBan if at least 2/3 of the words in one of these wordlists is present in a comment.

  1. monkey,business,tortured,slave,raped,exclusive,sun
    (7 words; AB if at least 5 of these words are present)
  2. marissa,van,eck,fakename,nigger,cunt,real,disorder
    (8 words; AB if at least 6 of these words are present)
  3. chicken,cow,pig,rat,moose,catfish
    (6 words; AB if at least 4 of these words are present)
  4. past,influence,exact,wood,communist,slide,punish
    (7 words; AB if at least 5 of these words are present)

Comments for fuzzy matching (i.e., to see if an attempted comment matches one of these, and if so, gets "caught" as such):

  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus ac nisi mattis elit cursus facilisis. Sed viverra eros libero, tristique commodo nibh rhoncus et. Nulla dapibus purus sit amet imperdiet dictum. Sed dapibus lorem in aliquet pulvinar. Maecenas rhoncus luctus lectus. Sed eget nisi tortor. Donec cursus enim ac viverra ornare. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Sed eu pellentesque odio. Pellentesque vel nunc consequat, interdum turpis nec, condimentum mi. Etiam quis aliquet magna. Phasellus non lobortis nibh. Praesent elementum id nunc nec rutrum.

  2. Vivamus quis sapien non arcu varius dictum. Nulla eleifend magna ut sem ultrices, id fringilla arcu varius. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Cras non neque leo. Etiam auctor rhoncus odio in tincidunt. Maecenas vehicula egestas dignissim. Praesent efficitur aliquam mauris a vestibulum. Proin quis purus non diam ultricies placerat ut ut dolor. Donec lacus ante, malesuada cursus ipsum eu, dapibus vestibulum arcu. Phasellus ultrices tempor dictum. Pellentesque pretium et metus id maximus. Pellentesque consequat justo eget congue vehicula. Vivamus ultricies, neque ac accumsan suscipit, nibh leo pharetra nulla, ut sollicitudin augue tellus non elit.

  3. Nam magna quam, venenatis quis ultrices vel, bibendum in est. Vivamus interdum ante odio, tristique accumsan nulla elementum at. Mauris non fringilla leo. Sed ac condimentum mi. Pellentesque feugiat sapien hendrerit, mollis nibh at, pulvinar odio. Aliquam sagittis fermentum felis, vitae ullamcorper ipsum ornare et. Nam quis cursus massa. Nulla facilisi. Aliquam id molestie arcu. Donec facilisis ligula vitae elementum aliquet. Aenean ultricies urna eget dolor tempus, gravida suscipit enim bibendum. Aliquam aliquam commodo lacus, ac imperdiet dui congue at. Integer semper gravida dolor, sit amet molestie felis consequat sit amet. Phasellus suscipit elit sagittis gravida semper. Etiam tincidunt ipsum nisi, vel eleifend ligula sagittis eget. Nullam cursus, lectus ac bibendum fringilla, tortor mi fermentum leo, nec tristique urna orci eget massa.

  4. Marissa Van Eck FAKENAME NIGGER CUNT Azuma Hazuki: So "that was NOT me posting" [] which YES, you said when you LIBELED me publicly BEFORE it with YOU saying "So that's a "yes" to schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and a "no" to "am taking meds for said disorder" LIBELING ME then...?" per YOUR [] you stupid pitiful FAKENAME fuck online LIAR piece of fucking SHIT NIGGER?


    Was it when I GOT YOUR REAL NAME & found you are a satanist/anti-god HERE [] also which most ALL you "LEFTIST" LOSER weirdos usually are (which YES, in THIS other exchange "Why do you assume that you finding discussion threads on other sites with me in them will scare me?" quoted from [] you DID admit FINALLY to saying it was you - ESPECIALLY AFTER dozens of doctors RECENTLY seconded me on Hydroxychloroquin + Zinc (& Vitamin D3 imo along w/ other things I noted that are anti-viral + antibacterial like RAW GARLIC too)).

    Do me a favor - DENY ANY OF THOSE, please & I will continue PROVING YOU ARE A NIGGER SHITBAG LOSER, devil... as I already DID here []

    The TRUE BEAUTY of SATANIST FUCKS like YOU (antigod assholes)? TRUTH & FACT DESTROYS LIBELOUS DEVILS LIKE YOU - just like I did you & OTHER AHOLES who doubted what I wrote on what is NOW PROVEN TRUE by DOCTORS, admitted in mainstream media etc. (as I showed in those links' exchanges above easily) & especially LATELY by DOZENS of doctors (I have proof from pros - NOT LIBEL like you did to me PUBLICLY & I can still FRY YOU FOR IT FUCKER, live in fear fuck) MINUS any psych pros backing you.

    SAY 1 THING, YOU STINKING LIBELOUS NIGGER FUCK & I will CONTINUE LEVELLING YOU PUBLICLY with facts - not libel as you tried on me, stupid "Marissa von DUMBO", lol - please, say 1 thing & the BEATING on you, PUBLICLY will continue in this thread where you will have a HELL of a TIME "downmod burying it" via downmod brigades doubtless ONLY yourself via multiple sockpuppet accounts etc. (downodding to HIDE it? FORGET IT vs. me - everyone sees you @ it now, lol - thanks, just as I SAID "your kind", demonic SWINE/antigod LOSERS, always do).


    TOUGH HIDING YOU LIED about LIBELING ME, especially via INHERENTLY DAMAGING STATEMENTS libeling me as you did see GOLDWATER RULE below too fuckface CUNT you are (wikipedia proof [] & you said "No jury or judge would back it" here [] Ok - like I said earlier here which you TRIED TO DOWNMOD HIDE as I knew you HAVE to (everyone sees it anyhow) - TRY ME FUCKER - say 1 thing you COWARDLY STUPID LITTLE FUCK & we'll SEE what happens to you, fuckface CUNT you are).

    As I said "DO YOU WANT TO BE SUED" for breaking the GOLDWATER RULE? See here again [] for YOUR (& everyone else's) reference of YOUR LIBEL of myself


    P.S.=> Oh, I am going to have a FIELDDAY on YOUR ASS fucker - catching you not ONLY IN LIES above, but also in the fact you are a GODLESS fucking LOSER - come on, say something, question the above where you LIED fucker ("it was not me saying it" but it WAS in those links calling me a nutcase essentially when YOU SAID YOU DID NOT (because it IS grounds for SUING THE LIFE OUT OF YOUR WORTHLESS ASS because your statements are NOT BACKED BY actual psychiatric pros in professional psychiatric grounds LIBELING ME)) - oh, you are NEVER going to LIVE THIS DOWN & believe you me - I am going to MAKE SURE you don't - live with your HUMILIATION loser... apk

posted by Subsentient on Monday August 17 2020, @04:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the pseudoscience dept.

Did a journal retract your paper on homeopathy? Meet the journal that will publish your complaint:

In 2016, Homeopathy lost its slot on Thomson Reuters’s (now Clarivate’s) influential journal rankings list after an analysis found that more than 70% of citations in the papers it published were of papers it published. That led Elsevier to cut the journal loose — although it remains in business under the umbrella of Thieme, and has since earned its impact factor back.

Part of Homeopathy’s mission under new ownership, it seems, is to criticize journals that have spurned its contributors. Well, one journal, anyway.

Last November, the journal published a commentary by two researchers of Verona. The piece objected to the retraction earlier in the year of a paper on homeopathy and wound healing by one of the authors, Marta Marzatto — who didn’t agree with the decision then and hasn’t gotten over the slight [...]

In June 2019, the journal PLoS ONE retracted an original research article, published in 2016, which described the effects of homeopathic Arnica montana on interleukin-4 treated human macrophages. The results showed an increase in extracellular matrix gene expression, including the gene encoding fibronectin, which is one of the main proteins involved in connective tissue healing. Here, the authors of the article discuss the critical points raised by the journal in the retraction note, with a focus on the specific methodological aspects of research on high dilutions of natural compounds. The editorial arguments made to justify the retraction did not prove any methodological errors, nor scientific misconduct. As a general rule, when a study published by a group of researchers raises scientific doubts because the results appear at variation with the commonly accepted knowledge in a field, the study is repeated by other scholars and any contrasting results are published and/or discussed. Therefore, retraction of the Arnica m. study by PLoS ONE is a violation of the conventions of scientific publication and knowledge-sharing methods derived from honest experimental method.

And earlier this month, the journal took another shot at PLoS ONE. In this case, the authors, a group from Mexico City, tried the old "like cures like" approach:

In April 2020 PLoS ONE retracted an original clinical research article, published in 2015, in which we demonstrated that individualized homeopathic treatment improves depression symptoms in climacteric women. The original assessment of this study was carried out by an expert in psychiatry (depression research) with close to 35 years’ experience in the field of mental health. During post-publication discussions, no serious breaches of scientific procedure or misconduct were even insinuated. Our team answered all “points of concern”, raised by the current PLoS ONE editors, in extensive detail. All these were potential limitations of our study, which would usually be addressed by one of several appropriate post-publication actions, ranging from discussion of the concern within a systematic review, through to correcting the study itself by adding a correction notice. Therefore, in the interests of transparency and accuracy, a summary of the most relevant points is provided, so that a fair-minded reader can objectively form a clear opinion.

Original Submission

posted by Subsentient on Monday August 17 2020, @02:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the hard-to-swallow dept.

Jack Daniel’s-Maker Suffers REvil Ransomware Breach:

US wine and spirits giant Brown-Forman has become the latest big-name brand to suffer a serious ransomware-related data breach, cyber-criminals have claimed.
The Jack Daniel’s-maker has released few details about the incident but claimed it successfully prevented attackers from encrypting its files.

"We are working closely with law enforcement, as well as world class third-party data security experts, to mitigate and resolve this situation as soon as possible,” it added in a brief statement.
“There are no active negotiations.”

However, as is often the case, the attackers appear to have taken extra steps to force a ransom payment from the company. They told Bloomberg that 1TB of corporate data is now in their hands and it will most likely be leaked online in batches to turn up the pressure on the Louisville, Kentucky-headquartered firm.

The group apparently responsible for this attack is Sodinokibi (REvil), which, like Maze and other gangs, maintains a dedicated leak site to post stolen data on.
As per previous attacks, it has already shared screenshots of file names as proof of its claims, some dating back over 10 years.

Original Submission

posted by Subsentient on Monday August 17 2020, @07:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the this-is-why-I-don't-do-infosec dept.

Teen charged with illegally accessing publicly accessible documents over government web portal:

A 19 year old teenager was charged with 'unauthorized use of a computer' after downloading over 7,000 records from the Nova Scotia Freedom-of-Information web portal. The teenager whose name has not been released, has been accused of stealing documents from the portal, with many of them being publicly accessible and redacted.

Between March 3rd and 5th of 2018, approximately 7,000 documents containing sensitive information including birth dates, social insurance numbers, addresses, and client information related to government services were stated to be illegally accessed.

Nova Scotians were only notified of the breach a week after it had been discovered and last week a Halifax teenager was arrested and charged in relation to the incident. If found guilty, he could face up to 10 years in prison.

Original Submission

posted by Subsentient on Monday August 17 2020, @05:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the peace-of-mind dept.

New tool checks if a password has been compromised, without sending it to a remote server:

A new system that securely checks whether your passwords have been made public in known data breaches has been integrated into the widely used password manager, 1Password. This new tool lets customers find out if their passwords have been leaked without ever transmitting full credentials to a server.

Security researcher Troy Hunt this week announced his new version of "Pwned Passwords," a search tool and list of more than 500 million passwords that have been leaked in data breaches. Users can access it online and developers can connect applications to it via an API.

Within a day, the company AgileBits had integrated Hunt's new tool into the 1Password password manager. AgileBits' announcement describes how it works:

Troy's new service allows us to check your passwords while keeping them safe and secure. They're never sent to us or his service.

First, 1Password hashes your password using SHA-1. But sending that full SHA-1 hash to the server would provide too much information and could allow someone to reconstruct your original password. Instead, Troy's new service only requires the first five characters of the 40-character hash.

To complete the process, the server sends back a list of leaked password hashes that start with those same five characters. 1Password then compares this list locally to see if it contains the full hash of your password. If there is a match then we know this password is known and should be changed.

Original Submission

posted by martyb on Thursday July 09 2020, @09:10AM   Printer-friendly
Paste your code into a comment on this story.
posted by martyb on Tuesday June 23 2020, @10:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the go-for-it! dept.

Test story to put comments on (2020-06-23)

Original Submission